Volume 2 covers the transition to using a 3D representation of the Earth’s climate data. This provides a more realistic estimate of the changes in global temperatures. In addition we propose an explanation of the long term evolution of Ice Age cycles (see below).
- A new Global Temperature Calculation
- Central England Temperatures – Spring Record 1659-2016
- Mid Pliocene warm Period
- Icosahedral Binning
- A new measurement of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS)
- When is the nest Ice Age due ?
- ACORN-SAT analysis
- Raw data shows no warming in Australia
- Homogenisation – 3 examples
- Australia is not getting warmer. It is getting less cold !
- Temperature Anomalies and ‘Abnormalities’
- A new analysis of Global Land Daily temperature data
- GHCN-Daily Temperature Anomaly Results
- The Milankovitch Puzzle
- Towards an understanding of Ice Ages
- Denied
- Global Temperatures – the big picture
- Zeke’s Wonder Plot
- A sceptic’s guide to global temperatures
- A comparison of HadCRUT4.6 using Icosahedral binning
- Spatial integration of global temperatures
- 30 years of IPCC assessment reports – How well have they done?
- The baseline problem
- Steven Koonin v Andrew Desler
- Nights warm faster than days.
- Natural Carbon Balance
- Decadal Temperature Update
- Toba Supervolcano
- Does the focus on one iconic global temperature plot make sense?
- July 2023 “Global Boiling” Panic
- Deducing Climate Sensitivity from Decadal Temperature Data
- Richard Betts/Met Office warming Indicator
- A Measurement of Climate Sensitivity
- 2024 global average temperature was 1.23C
Full details of all the 3D methods used can be found here
A theory of Ice Ages is proposed. Towards an understanding of Ice Ages.
Hello Clive
“Australia is not getting warmer” does not appear to be link
Thanks
paul.
Yes I screwed up ! Will fix soon
This is very nuch a work in progress!
https://clivebest.com/blog/?p=8389
I have been watching Tom Nelson podcast and the disagreement between Ned Nikolov and Cohler/Soon about being able to establish a global average temperature.
Regardless of the ability to establish an average and its meaning on the emissions from the earth’s surface,
It made me think that averaging the temperatures alone is not sufficient. Averaging temperatures is meaningless but averaging the overall energy emitted is.
What should be averaged is the SB emission (based on temperature) with rectification being made for the surface area of that emission/temperature measurement. Obviously the South Pole at -80C is a small area and the equator is a large area with much higher emission.
Using your model, are you able to calculate the total emission from the surface based on your triangulation method, then sum the total emission/m2 and back calculate the SB emission temperature for the earth.
Are you also able to refine that for the emissivity across the globe?
I did a very rough excel calculation and came up with an average global emission temperature of about 17.9C.