Mars Greenhouse effect

Mars has a much thinner atmosphere than Earth but it is 95% composed of CO2. One might therefore expect a larger greenhouse effect, since there are 20 times more CO2 molecules in the Martian atmosphere than there are on Earth. To quantify this I have run my greenhouse model (described here) for Mars, using the following parameters:

  1.  lapse rate = 10.5 K/km
  2.  g=3.7 m/s2
  3.  P0 = 600 Pa
  4.  Ts = 210 deg.K.
  5. Following Nasa we take the top of the troposphere as 7km.

The result is shown in Figure 1.

 

Fig 1: The up-going radiation flux within the 13-17 micron CO2 band for Martian atmosphere. The zero level is the flux for temperature 210K with zero CO2.

The reduction in outgoing flux at the ground from CO2 is 8 watts/m2. Using the formula DS/DT = 4.sigmaT^3 results in a net CO2 induced warming effect of just 2 degrees.C ! In fact measurements show that the greenhouse effect on Mars is in fact only between 1-5 degrees C.  So how come the total warming is so small on Mars ? There are a lot of hand waving arguments about the low density being responsible,  but the real difference between Mars and Earth  is that the surface temperature is much cooler to start with.  Total IR radiation to space goes as T^4 so there is far nearly 4 times less flux to be absorbed by CO2 molecules on Mars than on the Earth. So although there are 20 times more CO2 molecules above each square meter  on Mars  than on Earth, they absorb less net energy and consequently the greenhouse warming is less. 

What about Venus ?  I’ll look into that next.

 

About Clive Best

PhD High Energy Physics Worked at CERN, Rutherford Lab, JET, JRC, OSVision
This entry was posted in AGW, Climate Change, climate science, Physics, Science and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Mars Greenhouse effect

  1. Kim Libera says:

    Clive-retired earth scientist/mathematician here. Couple queries. Ok the Mars example. I just found it that it has 95% co2, then why is it heating up aka via the theory presented by the global warming alarmists? Ok so they may answer oh it’s too far away. But when I try to explain Venus to them & compare Venus with Earth, point being we have a couple things Venus does not have & thats ocean basins & vegetation. Venus essentially banded in clouds & now geologically dead. They don’t get that the Earth has 2 major sinks & that helps counteract their nonsense. But also too when they propose we send X gigatons of co2 into the air & of course the only part they’re concerned of is the fossil fuel stuff & not basic exhaled breath, I keep saying well thenn why does co2 remain at 0.038%. How would you answer that?

    • Clive Best says:

      Although the atmosphere is 95% CO2 the air is very thin so the total amount of CO2. The pressure is only 0.006 that on earth. So the total amount of CO2 is about the same as that on earth. (0.004). It seems that Mars lost its atmosphere because it doesn’t have a protective magnetic field to shield it from the solar wind.

      It is true that the earth has oceans and life which helps stabilise the climate.

  2. John Doll says:

    Hi Clive,
    Not to nitpick, but Ts on Mars is not 210 C° but 210K.
    You may also want to double check the “0.004” you may have mixed up some metric system prefixes in to arrive at that number.
    Be well,
    John

    • Clive Best says:

      Yes you are quite right ! deg. K

      • John Doll says:

        Hello again Clive,
        There really was no need to make my last comment public and nor is there any need to make this one public.

        What I meant by the 0.004 comment is that I think you’re expressing the percentage of CO2 in earths atmosphere as a fraction (if that’s the correct word), the percentage of CO2 in earths atmosphere is 0.04%,
        So 0.04% ÷ 100 = 0.0004. I think you dropped a zero.
        Please don’t make this post public.
        Thanks
        John

        • John Doll says:

          I didn’t realise my comments get posted immediately without your moderation.
          Feel free to delete these as to not dirty up your site.
          And I feel you are correct, the greenhouse effect plays only a tiny part in the earths temperature. Shifting away from fossil fuels is a great idea for for many other reasons, but the whole CO2 caused global warming thing stinks to high heaven.
          But it seems the fix is in, the money is flowing, and man made climate change will be a “fact” for the foreseeable future.
          Be well,
          John

Leave a Reply to John Doll Cancel reply