Long term temperature trends are best visualised on decadal timescales. This is because it smooths out short term local effects caused for example by ENSO and other ocean oscillations. My method to achieve this in a consistent way uses an icosahedral grid where each equal area cell is averaged over 10 years (see here). I have now updated my previous results to cover also the 2011-2020 decade. These results are shown below. If you click on each header such as 2011-2020 West-Hemisphere then you access the 3D icosahedral gridded temperature data directly. Simply click and spin the globe (thanks to Nick Stokes!)
The colour scale shows temperature differences relative to a baseline of 1961-1990
The warming trend since 1970 appears to be linear as shown below.
Ten year average temperatures based spherical triangulation of GHCN4/HadSST4
Overall the world has warmed by about 0.8C starting around 1965. However, CO2 levels have if anything been rising faster than the temperature response.
Moana Loa CO2 measurements.
The temperature response appears to be linear to an exponential increase in CO2 levels. Therefore there is no evidence of any positive climate feedback to CO2. Instead it is far more likely to be a negative feedback.
We need to eventually stop burning fossil fuels and find realistic alternatives, but there is no imminent “climate emergency” or “climate breakdown”.
. Thanks to Nick Stokes for the WebGL visualisation
Global temperatures fell in September by 0.1C to 0.82 C above the 1961-1990 baseline. The annual temperature after 9 months remains unchanged at 0.85C
Monthly Global Temperatures since 2010
There remains a strong La Nina affecting mainly the Southern Hemisphere. Central Eurasia temperatures were also below normal.
Global temperatures for September 2022
2022 is set to be the around the 4th equal warmest year together with 2015 and 2017.
See 3d Spherical Triangulation for details of method.
The total Biomass on Earth is 560 billion tonnes of carbon [see ref] most of which is in the form of plant life. If we now calculate the mass of carbon atoms held in the atmosphere in the form of CO2 for a concentration of 280 ppm then we find there is 600 billion tonnes [see ref using 280 ppm] . These two are almost identical which in my opinion cannot be a coincidence. It seems that nature balances the CO2 levels in the atmosphere so as to match the carbon content in the Biosphere (and vice versa). During Ice Ages the spread of ice sheets reduces the available land biosphere and as a consequent CO2 levels fall. These then recover during an interglacial. Over the very long term plate tectonics ensures that any buried carbon by rock weathering is recycled through volcanoes.
Now of course in the short term humans have cleared large areas of forests and added CO2 to the atmosphere, so the two carbon sinks were even closer 100 years ago. I suspect that what this all means is that the living biomass carbon content is slowly being returned to the atmosphere at the same rate as photosynthesis is consuming carbon from CO2 and sustaining oxygen levels in the atmosphere. Photosynthesis by plants liberates oxygen to the atmosphere as a by-product. Animals then consume both oxygen and biomass to live, thereby returning their “waste” CO2 back to the atmosphere maintaining a balanced level of 21% of the atmosphere. I suspect it is probably forest fires that currently limit the oxygen content to ~21% of the atmosphere.
During the early Carboniferous period the continents were joined together in one large continent (Pangea) and the climate was much warmer and humid with CO2 levels reaching 1500 ppm and higher levels of oxygen than today. Therefore if we assume the same relationship holds, then there must have been about four times more biomass compared today in order to “balance” the 1500 ppm in the atmosphere. During the Carboniferous period the world’s coal reserves were buried in inland swamps. This carbon loss from the biosphere therefore led to a gradual reduction of atmospheric CO2, eventually leading towards current levels and a cooler dryer climate ending coal deposits.
Currently atmospheric CO2 levels are out of balance with the earth’s biomass. This is firstly because we have burned some of the buried Carboniferous carbon (coal) and secondly because we have also curtailed the natural biomass to meet our farming needs. The carbon deficit seems therefore to be as follows.
- Biomass has fallen from 600 billion tonnes to 560 billion tonnes ( A deficit of 40 billion tonnes )
- The carbon content of atmospheric CO2 has risen from 600 billion tonnes (280ppm) to 900 billion tonnes (417ppm) (A surplus of 300 billion tonnes )
Reforestation would probably be the quickest route to begin rebalancing carbon. Burning biomass as a renewable energy source looks like a bad idea as it goes in the opposite direction. Much of Africa also still relies on wood and charcoal for cooking.
Eliminating the burning of fossil fuels means finding an alternative energy source. The problem with most traditional renewable energy sources is that they are weather dependent and are often out of phase with energy demand. It is mainly Hydro , Geothermal and Tidal power that are reliable and predictable sources. Furthermore if we want to electrify transport and heating then demand will more than double. That means eventually reaching a grid capacity of ~ 80 GW.
Only Nuclear power can realistically achieve this goal, perhaps eventually through Nuclear Fusion. We then hopefully will be able to rebalance global carbon.