Subscribe via Email
Live UK Power
Last 24 hours
-
Recent Posts
- Temperature update for Oct 2023 is 1.1C
- Direct evidence that CO2 forcing alone determines Global Temperatures
- Deducing Climate Sensitivity from Decadal Temperature Data
- September’s Global Temperature was 1.44C
- Power generation Summer 2023
- July 2023 “Global Boiling” Panic
- July 2023 global temperature anomaly was 1.20C
- History of Climate Change
- June 2023 Global Temperature was 1.1 C
- Global temperature update – April 2023
- Does the focus on one iconic global temperature plot make sense?
- Toba Supervolcano
- April Global Temperature Anomaly falls to 0.96C
- Tom Nelson Podcast
- March 2023 Global Temperatures
- Feb 2023 Global temperature was 0.89C
- Trends in Maximum and Diurnal temperatures in Australia
- Climate Change in Australia
- A 20 day “wind lull” in December 2022
- UK Peak Power 2022/23
Recent Comments
- Dr Clive Best on CO2 GHE
- Bob Peckham on Direct evidence that CO2 forcing alone determines Global Temperatures
- Peter Grafström on Direct evidence that CO2 forcing alone determines Global Temperatures
- Gregg E Neuendorf on Temperature update for Oct 2023 is 1.1C
- Hugo on Temperature update for Oct 2023 is 1.1C
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsCategories
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: AR5
The Logical Fallacy behind ‘Representative Concentration Pathways’
Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) used in AR5 are future projections of greenhouse emissions according to different mitigation scenarios. So for example there is a ‘business as usual’ high emission scenario (RCP8.5) and a midrange mitigation emissions scenario (RCP4.5). CMIP5 model projections are … Continue reading
Posted in AGW, Climate Change, climate science, IPCC, Science
Tagged AR5, Climate Sensitivity, IPCC
6 Comments
AR5 Attribution Studies
Just how reliable is the IPCC AR5 advice to policy makers? The recent IPCC report stated that climate scientists are 95-100% certain that the observed temperature rise since 1850 is anthropogenic. The headline attribution statement in Chapter 10 was “It … Continue reading
Posted in AGW, Climate Change, climate science, IPCC, Science
Tagged AR5, Attribution, IPCC
10 Comments